Recently Southern Evangelical Seminary put up a video on Vimeo from the 20th Annual National Conference on Christian Apologetics 2013 entitled “Young Earth Presuppositionalism”. It is a friendly debate featuring Richard Howe, Jason Lisle, and K.Scott Oliphint exploring how apologetic method effects (or if it does) our view of the age of the earth.
Btw, after you finish listening to the debate, I recommend reading the review of the debate over at Holloway Quarterly here: http://www.hollowayquarterly.com/2013/12/young-earthers-and-presuppositionalism.html
While we are on this subject, a few months ago, a person asked me through this blog the question: “Was Van Til a Six Day Creationist?”
To which I replied:
“Good question and thanks for the link. Before researching, my answer is yes, my reasoning is as follows:
1.) he was a minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church from 1936 until his death.
2.) “Officers in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church take a vow to “sincerely receive and adopt” these confessional documents “as containing the system of doctrine taught in the Holy Scriptures.” – OPC Confession standards
3.) from the Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter IV
I. “It pleased God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, for the manifestation of the glory of His eternal power, wisdom, and goodness, in the beginning, to create, or make of nothing, the world, and all things therein whether visible or invisible, in the space of six days; and all very good.
II. After God had made all other creatures, He created man, male and female, with reasonable and immortal souls, endued with knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness, after His own image; having the law of God written in their hearts, and power to fulfil it; and yet under a possibility of transgressing, being left to the liberty of their own will, which was subject unto change. Beside this law written in their hearts, they received a command, not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil; which while they kept, they were happy in their communion with God, and had dominion over the creatures.”
4. Now that I have researched, if you have access to his book “The Defense of the Faith” turn to Chapter 9 “Argument by Presupposition” from the subsection “Creation out of Nothing”
“On the question of creation I believe that it pleased God “for the manifestation of the glory of his eternal power, wisdom, and goodness, in the beginning, to create, or make of nothing, the world, and all things therein, whether visible or invisible, in the space of six days and all very good.” This doctrine of creation fits in with the doctrine of the ontological trinity. If God is fully self-contained then there was no sort of half existence and no sort of non-being that had any power over against him. There was therefore no impersonal law of logic that told God what he could do and there was no sort of stuff that had as much even as refractory power over against God when he decided to create the world.
I have not merely held but have also frequently defended this doctrine. I have defended it not merely against those who openly reject it or assert it to be impossible on the basis of logic as was the case with Parmenides. I have defended it against those who assumed the existence of some sort of limiting power next to God. I have in particular defended it against all forms of modern dialecticism, whether Hegelian or Barthian.” – Van Til, C., & Sigward, E. H. (1997). The works of Cornelius Van Til, 1895-1987 (electronic ed.). New York: Labels Army Co.
A few thoughts with a disclaimer, I do not know much about the theological beliefs of Richard Howe and Jason Lisle, but I do know Dr. Oliphint is a confessional Presbyterian, he holds to the Westminster Confession of Faith which entails holding to a six day creation. So there is agreement between Dr. Oliphint and Dr. Lisle on the number of days of creation. Please keep in mind, I have no desire to diminish either Dr. Oliphint or Dr. Lisle, however I have to disagree with a comment by Dr. Lisle regarding interpretation of Scripture (something along the lines of: a reader only needing to read a passage x amount of times before they ‘get it’). The reason I disagree is because the comment seemed to not take into account a Reformed anthropology. What I mean is, the imputed effects of sin on all of Adam’s descendants. I think Dr. Oliphint noticed the same crucial component missing from Dr. Lisle’s explanation, and came on strong addressing the issue. On the other hand, I also think Dr. Oliphint may struggle to an extent with presuppositional methodology applied to a biblical doctrine of creation. Overall, I think it is an interesting debate, and definitely worth listening to.
The following videos were posted to YouTube by slaves4christ, and are part of the Origins TV archive. These are low quality, but hey they’re freebies.
“Dr. Lisle presents an ultimate proof for the existence of God and the truth of creation. He goes beyond the battle over “evidence,” and demonstrates why and how we are to defend the faith. Dr. Lisle shows how only the Christian worldview can account for the world we live in.”
“Dr. Lisle gives a lesson in logic and the fallacies evolutionists make.”
“Donn Chapman and Jason Lisle talk about astronomical evidence for creation and the Bible.”
Dr. Lisle has a blog here: http://www.jasonlisle.com/ which I encourage my guests to frequently visit.
The following YouTube video features a relatively recent debate between Christian apologist Rev Joe Boot, an exceptional presuppositionalist (Van Tillian? I think so), and atheist Dan Barker. For those who may not know, Dan Barker claims to be an ex-Christian, an ex-minister even, a real apostate. Since his apostasy, Barker has participated in many debates against Christians (including James White). As an experienced debater, Barker has had many years to fine tune arguments in the field of rhetoric. Despite this, Rev Joe Boot leaves his subjectivist position found lacking, barren, and bankrupt. Watch for yourself as Rev Joe Boot TAG’s Barker!
Btw, who would have thought a presuppositionalist could come from or would have been part of RZIM? Strange world we live in.
I am excited to share this great news, “Logic: A God Centered Approach” by Vern Poythress is now available in it’s entirety for free download at: frame-poythress.org
Dear friends, please consider purchasing a hard copy if you can, and please share your thoughts, feedback is appreciated!
Host of Reformed Forum Jared Oliphint interviewed Dr. Poythress concerning his book Logic: A God-Centered Approach. To listen Go Here
Unfortunately, the Gospel Coalition posted the following article: http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/tgc/2012/03/12/questioning-presuppositionalism/. Below we have a video of James White responding to the article by popular philosopher, apologist, and author Paul Copan.
Let’s start the new year off with a bang! Check out the ebook section at frame-poythress.org: http://www.frame-poythress.org/ebooks/ for many free books in electronic formats.
Dear friends, Dr. Poythress (and Dr. Frame) and the respective publishers have been most generous making these available free of charge (which is rare with newer books), please consider also purchasing hard copies if possible.
Titles by Dr. Poythress in PDF format include:
Other titles are available in other formats. Anyone seeking a “God-Centered” approach should appreciate any and all of these titles. Praise God for these resources!
For those interested, an interview with Vern discussing his book “Inerrancy and Worldview”
“My book Inerrancy and Worldview focuses on the way in which assumptions due to a modern worldview affect people’s understanding of the Bible. A large number of modern criticisms of the Bible and modern claims to find “errors” arise from injecting erroneous assumptions belonging to modern worldviews. People see errors because they misconstrue the Bible’s claims or find them implausible when measured against their standard assumptions. They do not humbly endeavor to understand the Bible on its own terms.” – Vern Poythress